I had a couple of people forward me these emails to speak out about Net Neutrality. Since I do that and have done that, well here is another post on that topic. I want to start with that everybody that comments on this has an agenda. So do I. My agenda is to try to change the primary issue to Universal Broadband Access and away from Net Neutrality.
I want to change this for 2 reasons:
- No Tier 1 has been shown to violate Net Neutrality (Comcast - Netflix was shown to be a problem with Cogent; a Netflix vendor)
- We still have a divide and no plan to provide escalting bandwidth and our existing methodologies have failed
This lack of broadband exists in some city neighborhoods and some rural areas but is generally not a problem in smaller cities and suburbs. The problem I have with our current version of Net Neutrality is more technical and comes from two places as well.
First, I think we ought to redo our rules around residential service to make them common for all Service Providers independent of last mile technology. The basic services are converging. It seems silly to me to have multiple paradigms to regulate this under. By having a common code, we have a more level playing field.
Second, I think we need to take a closer look at services and spectrum allocation. Right now all of our broadband technologies support at least 2 and sometimes 3 services. Many of these have multiple streams running in different bandwidth allocations over the same infrastructure. For example, Cable Modems occupy 1 or more of the modulation groups on the cable. The others are occupied by Linear TV and Pay-Per-View services that are not available for broadband. The thing is that all of our networks would benefit from a retirement of older technologies and using a unified method of deploying services. That way we can more flexibly allocate bandwidth and provide better service.
My proposal would be 100% penetration and conversion to IP delivery by 2025. We could use the USF and other support mechanisms to make this happen. This is the kind of infrastructure investment that we require for the 21st Century. I would also add into this a requirement that all lines support 100 Mb/s symmetrical service at 2025 and that we have a plan to grow this over time with new numbers set in either 5 or 10 year increments.
This would spur massive investment in the US communications industry and make our network the envy of the world. So if I were in charge, that is where my focus would be. There is nothing wrong with making sure we have common carriage for most services. But we need investment, and this is where it should go.
Have a great day!
Focal Point Business Coaching
Business Coaching, Leadership Training, Sales Training, Strategic Planning
Change Your Business - Change Your Life!